I am no expert on all
things literary. I have thoughts, opinions, observations, just as you
all do. Not all my thoughts, opinions and observations are agreeable
to everyone of course, but then varied opinion adds spice to what
could otherwise be an all too polite conversation about books. And
where is the fun in an all too polite conversation? Those are best
left to the Victorians who are, thankfully, extinct.
In the spirit of varied
opinion. I have one. An observation if you will. On why people are
drawn to types of characters, plots, settings and story feel.
To my eyes it comes
down to this. What part of your mind do you use when you read?
I believe that, though
very much a woman, I read with my masculine side.
That doesn't mean I like battles and macho-centric books, what it means is that I have a low tolerance for feminine drama and emotions and for female characters (unless they too seem driven by their masculine side). I have this low tolerance in life anyway, but I have even less tolerance for it in books. I prefer adult male characters and male dominated settings.
That doesn't mean I like battles and macho-centric books, what it means is that I have a low tolerance for feminine drama and emotions and for female characters (unless they too seem driven by their masculine side). I have this low tolerance in life anyway, but I have even less tolerance for it in books. I prefer adult male characters and male dominated settings.
I am not necessarily a
product of my environment although I do live in a male dominated
world and I speak to men many times a week and can go many months
without speaking to another woman. There is no doubt that how you
interact with your fellow man/woman in real life can be reflected in
your reading tastes, but I still believe wholeheartedly that, as
individuals, our path through life has trained our brains to enjoy
and seek out particular types of characters and personalities in
books.
So what parts of the
mind do I think people read with?
To me there are three
very definitive ones. The feminine, the masculine and the inner
child.
The feminine reader can
be male or female and he/she seems to need some form of female
presence in books. Female characters are preferable to the reader who
reads with their feminine side, but they aren't completely necessary.
If a book has no prominent female characters, the feminine reader
needs the male characters to be less macho and more emotive. A
nurturer, gentle lover, a deeply reflective soul, tortured, wielding
a charisma guaranteed to attract the opposite sex (or same
sex..whatever your fancy).
The feminine reader
likes matters of the heart.
The masculine reader
who also can be male or female, gets exasperated or worn down with
female characters and feminine feel. The masculine reader wants his
or her male characters to be preoccupied with living life and not
bothered with the whimsical and the melodramatic. He/she can read a
whole book without noticing there were no female characters.
Focus on marriages,
children, love and languishing in ones emotions are not valued
character features to the masculine reader.
The masculine reader
likes matters of the mind.
The inner child reader
is easy to spot. They are still young themselves, or are simply in
touch
with their inner child, or they will have children of their own
and delight in relating to child characters or in reading young adult
books because of that.
The inner child
reader is anchored to their childhood. There are memories there that
draw them to YA books or young characters in adult fiction. I do not
know what those memories are of course – I am not an inner child
reader – but I do often see men and women who read the children's
classics of their youth, or read YA or juvenile fiction because they
still have their childhood side deeply embedded in their psyche.
This does not mean the
inner child reader is emotionally stunted or childish. It only means
that something about YA books or child characters in adult books,
resonates with them and gives them succour.
The inner child reader
likes matters of the soul.
Naturally, some readers
are going to have pieces of all three toiling away inside them. One
is going to dominate their reading preferences however. One will
always be the strongest.
I, without shadow of
doubt, am dominated by my masculine side when I read. On occasion I
can feel a little of my feminine side like a candle flame flickering
dimly in a darkened window, but I never, ever read with my inner
child. I have one, as we all do, but it expresses itself in other
ways in my life. Joy of cooking mother's recipes, a lingering
infatuation with light pink colours, baby animals. But when it comes
to reading, I am all man, all of the way and I think romance is for
girls (or for guys with a little bit of girl inside them)!
- MM
What a fascinating insight. This may help explain something I discovered this month. I'd posted some extracts from my novels on a forum and found that women readers often latched on to the women in the passages even though they weren't central to the narrative. (This is me admitting to being a male(ish) writer.) I'm going to go away and think about your concepts and what it means to me as a reader and writer. Martin Lake
ReplyDeleteHi Martin,
DeleteThat is interesting. When I think about what that could actually mean to you as a writer..well..it opens up a can of worms doesn't it. What is your true audience? Despite writing in a male(ish) way, are you actually writing in a way that might appeal to the feminine reader more so than the masculine reader? or are you actually able to appeal to both...
Food for thought. Glad you got some insights out of my ramblings. :)